U
/u/Meowmeowbiiotch
Guest
Hey, idk if this is the right sub-reddit to type this on but i'll ask anyways just incase. So i'm a 2nd yr uni student and I got an assignment back, and turns out part of the marking criteria states no referencing of 'non-peer reviewed' sources, which is normal and I get that, which I DID, yet I also referenced my lecture slides as well just incase, for the basis of my research. the subject coordinator got a lot of angry emails and made a comment about how the lecture content/ slides were not considered 'reliable peer-reviewed sources'... ???. It was never stated that was the case, and I ALSO used over 5 peer reviewed articles based on research and stuff, (correctly). I wanted to know if this is a common occurrence, if its a normal and well known thing then i'll take it on the chin and move on, but it feels strange, considering the content that they literally teach us is considered technically 'unreliable' as a source. anyone else have this issue? (this is a chemistry/ biology based subject btw)
submitted by /u/Meowmeowbiiotch
[link] [comments]
Continue reading...
submitted by /u/Meowmeowbiiotch
[link] [comments]
Continue reading...